International scientific organizations
SRBR
Founded in 1986, the SRBR is an international scientific society dedicated to the study of biological rhythms, in particular circadian rhythms, cellular biological clocks and the mechanisms that regulate the periodicity of living organisms.
It promotes research and international scientific exchange and publishes the Journal of Biological Rhythms, a peer-reviewed specialist journal.
EBRS
Established in its current form in 2005 in Frankfurt am Main, the EBRS promotes the scientific study of biological rhythms and collaboration between European and international researchers.
It organizes congresses and scientific initiatives dedicated to chronobiology, circadian rhythms and their applications in biological and medical research.
Contemporary research
Studies and publications on biological periodicity
Contemporary research on biological rhythms includes studies on the mechanisms of cellular clocks, seasonal variations, individual chronotypes and the oscillations of physiological, cognitive and behavioural functions. This collection presents a selection of scientific publications organized by topic. Each reference is accompanied by a short description and a link to the original source.
The DOI (Digital Object Identifier) is a persistent digital identifier that leads to the page of a scientific publication. Access to the full text may depend on the conditions set by the publisher.
1. The Nobel Prize for research on circadian rhythms
2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
The 2017 Nobel Prize was awarded to Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash and Michael W. Young for their discoveries of the molecular mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms. Their research helped explain how cellular biological clocks work.
Source: Nobel Prize Outreach, The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2017.
View the official Nobel Prize page2. Biological clocks: molecular mechanisms and cellular regulation
How the biological clock of cells works
The mammalian circadian clock is based on molecular mechanisms of regulation and feedback that generate oscillations with a periodicity close to 24 hours.
Reference: Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2017;18(3):164–179.
View the publicationCentral and peripheral biological clocks
In mammals, a central circadian system helps coordinate numerous peripheral clocks distributed across tissues and organs.
Reference: Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2012;35:445–462.
View the publicationRhythmic gene expression in human tissues
A study conducted on different human tissues documented circadian variations in the expression of numerous genes, highlighting possible applications to circadian medicine.
Reference: Ruben MD, Wu G, Smith DF, et al. A database of tissue-specific rhythmically expressed human genes has potential applications in circadian medicine. Science Translational Medicine. 2018;10(458).
View the publication3. Seasonal rhythms and physiological cycles
Seasonal variations in gene expression
A study identified seasonal variations in the expression of thousands of human genes, with differences linked to the seasons and to geographic hemispheres.
Reference: Dopico XC, Evangelou M, Ferreira RC, et al. Widespread seasonal gene expression reveals annual differences in human immunity and physiology. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7000.
View the publicationMenstrual cycle and the organization of brain networks
Through repeated observations over thirty days on a single participant, the researchers studied variations in brain connectivity in relation to the hormonal oscillations of the menstrual cycle.
Reference: Pritschet L, Santander T, Taylor CM, et al. Functional reorganization of brain networks across the human menstrual cycle. NeuroImage. 2020;220:117091.
View the publication4. Individual chronotypes, sleep and social schedules
Individual differences in the circadian clock
An epidemiological study based on more than 55,000 questionnaires analysed individual differences in sleep and wake times, contributing to the understanding of chronotypes.
Reference: Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Juda M, et al. Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2007;11(6):429–438.
View the publicationSocial jet lag and body weight
The research examined the association between the misalignment of biological and social schedules and body mass index.
Reference: Roenneberg T, Allebrandt KV, Merrow M, Vetter C. Social jetlag and obesity. Current Biology. 2012;22(10):939–943.
View the publicationA scientific review on social jet lag
A systematic review with meta-analysis of 43 studies, including 231,648 participants in total, found generally positive associations of variable size between social jet lag and indicators of adiposity, without establishing a causal relationship.
Reference: Arab A, Karimi E, Garaulet M, Scheer FAJL. Social jetlag and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews. 2024;25(3).
View the publication5. Physical performance, cognitive functions and mood
Daily variations in physical performance
A systematic review with meta-analysis of 29 comparable studies examined variations in physical performance over the course of the day, considering endurance, power, handgrip strength and jump tests.
Reference: Knaier R, Qian J, Roth R, et al. Diurnal variation in maximum endurance and maximum strength performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2022;54(1):169–180.
View the publicationChronotype and athletes’ performance
The study found significant differences in the moments of peak athletic performance in relation to chronotype and time elapsed since waking.
Reference: Facer-Childs E, Brandstaetter R. The impact of circadian phenotype and time since awakening on diurnal performance in athletes. Current Biology. 2015;25(4):518–522.
View the publicationCircadian rhythms and cognitive functions
A scientific review examines the relationships between circadian rhythms, attention, memory and cognitive functions, highlighting the influence of the time of day and of individual differences.
Reference: Schmidt C, Collette F, Cajochen C, Peigneux P. A time to think: circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2007;24(7):755–789.
View the publicationChronotype, attention and physical performance
A study conducted on 56 participants documented different daily profiles of vigilance, executive function and physical strength between people with a morning and an evening chronotype.
Reference: Facer-Childs ER, Boiling S, Balanos GM. The effects of time of day and chronotype on cognitive and physical performance in healthy volunteers. Sports Medicine - Open. 2018;4(1):47.
View the publicationDaily and seasonal variations in mood
Through the linguistic analysis of millions of public messages, the researchers identified daily and seasonal patterns of emotional expression across different cultural contexts.
Reference: Golder SA, Macy MW. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science. 2011;333(6051):1878–1881.
View the publication6. Scientific methods of individual observation over time
Observing experiences at the moment they occur
*Ecological Momentary Assessment* is a method of repeated collection of information on people’s experiences and behaviours in their daily context, useful for reducing some distortions of retrospective recall.
Reference: Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2008;4:1–32.
View the publicationRepeated study of a single individual
*N-of-1* clinical trials are a methodological approach for systematically evaluating the effects of interventions on a single individual through repeated observations and comparisons.
Reference: Lillie EO, Patay B, Diamant J, Issell B, Topol EJ, Schork NJ. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Personalized Medicine. 2011;8(2):161–173.
View the publicationFrequently asked questions
What is the difference between classical biorhythmology and circadian rhythms?
Classical biorhythmology is based on three cycles of fixed length — 23, 28 and 33 days — calculated from the date of birth. Circadian rhythms, by contrast, are biological oscillations of about 24 hours that help regulate sleep, body temperature, hormone secretion and numerous other physiological functions. Chronobiology studies these rhythms through observations and experimental methods. In 2017 the discoveries on the molecular mechanisms of the circadian clock were recognized with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. The two fields share an interest in biological periodicity, but differ in theoretical models, research methods and available evidence.
Are circadian rhythms the same for everyone?
The fundamental mechanisms of the circadian clock are shared by human beings, but there are important individual differences in the way rhythms manifest themselves. An epidemiological study conducted on more than 55,000 people documented a wide distribution of chronotypes: some people naturally tend to wake up and fall asleep early, others much later. These differences depend on biological and environmental factors and help explain why the same schedules are not equally suitable for everyone.
Is there a best time of day to carry out certain activities?
Numerous studies have documented variations in physical and cognitive performance over the course of the day. A systematic review with meta-analysis published by Knaier and colleagues in 2022 found generally higher performance in the afternoon or early evening for some physical tests, especially those of anaerobic power and jumping. Other studies have shown that chronotype, time elapsed since waking and the characteristics of the activity can influence the moment of best performance. There is therefore no single optimal time valid for all people and all activities.
What is the couple compatibility calculation based on?
byourit uses the classical biorhythmological model of the three cycles of 23, 28 and 33 days, applied to the birth dates of two people. The calculation starts from the difference in days between the two birth dates. This difference is related separately to the three cycles, obtaining three compatibility values: physical, emotional and intellectual. The percentages represent the permanent compatibility provided by the biorhythmological model: for the same two people, the result does not change over time. The overall value offers a summary of the three results, while their separate analysis makes it possible to understand how it is composed. Compatibility is not a prediction of the outcome of a relationship, but a reading proposed by the biorhythmological model, to be considered together with the concrete experience of the people involved.